Illustrative example
Building a portfolio that must stay Shariah-compliant
A clear religious constraint, and the practical consequences most people are not warned about.
Not a real client. These are illustrative scenarios written to show how the framework is applied. They are not real clients, not records of actual results, and not investment recommendations. The figures are chosen to make the reasoning clear.
The situation
Starting position.
- Requirement
- Strictly Shariah-compliant holdings only
- Investable
- PKR 2,000,000, emergency fund already in place
- Horizon
- Fifteen years or more
- Income
- Business income, somewhat variable
- Experience
- Has held mutual funds, never individual shares
“I only want compliant investments. Do I just buy the KMI-30 companies and leave it?”
Working through it
The reasoning, in order.
- 01
Compliance is not a one-time filter
The most important thing to establish early is that screening is periodic, not permanent. A company that passes today can fail at the next review, sometimes without doing anything, because a fall in its market capitalisation changes a ratio.
So the plan needs a stated review cadence and a decision made in advance about what happens when a holding fails: how quickly to exit, and how to handle the income earned while it was non-compliant.
- 02
What the screening removes, structurally
Excluding conventional banks removes a large, liquid, dividend-paying part of the market, and the sector that typically benefits most when interest rates rise. That is a real characteristic of a compliant portfolio, not a minor omission.
The debt-ratio screen also tilts the portfolio away from heavily leveraged companies. Arguably that is a quality filter as much as a religious one, but it means the portfolio will behave differently across the rate cycle, and the person should expect that rather than be surprised by it.
- 03
The universe is smaller, so diversification takes more work
With a reduced set of eligible companies, reaching ten to fifteen holdings across genuinely different sectors requires deliberate effort. It is easy to end up with a compliant portfolio that is heavily concentrated in two or three sectors simply because those are what passed.
The discipline is to check sector exposure explicitly rather than assuming that a list of compliant names is automatically diversified.
- 04
Variable income changes the entry plan
Business income that fluctuates argues for a larger cash buffer and a more flexible contribution schedule than a salaried person would need. A fixed monthly amount that cannot be sustained in a bad quarter gets abandoned, which defeats the purpose.
Better to set a lower baseline contribution that survives a poor month, with discretionary additions in good ones.
- 05
Purification, planned rather than improvised
Even compliant companies may earn a small proportion of non-compliant income. Many publish a per-share purification figure. The plan specifies checking it annually, calculating the amount, and giving it away, as a scheduled task, not something remembered occasionally.
Where it lands
The plan that comes out.
The plan specifies a compliant universe with a stated screening source, a semi-annual compliance review with a pre-agreed exit process, an explicit sector-exposure check rather than an assumption of diversification, a sustainable baseline contribution suited to variable income, and an annual purification calculation.
Benchmarking is set against the KMI-30 rather than the KSE-100, because measuring a compliant portfolio against a market containing companies it would never buy produces a misleading picture.
No specific companies are named. The screening criteria and the review process are what the person takes away.
What this example shows: A religious constraint is a portfolio-construction constraint. Handled deliberately, it is entirely workable. The failure mode is treating "buy compliant stocks" as the whole plan and not noticing the concentration and review obligations it creates.
We teach. You execute. Your account. Your decisions. Always.
We do not take custody of your money or execute trades for you.
Other examples
Different situations.
Your numbers, not these ones
A Launchpad call works through your actual situation (income, savings, debts, horizon) and produces a written plan you own and execute yourself.
Book a callSee what is included